Canadian here. Listened to your new Conservative leader's conversation with Kostantin and the other guy on the Trigernomytry podcast. I gotta say, I was utterly underwhelmed by her positions on immigration and a whole host of other issues. To say she didn't get it was an understatement. Perhaps this is a good thing because it will put more people onto Reform or whatever right-ist party is going to give the UK back to the people. In Canada, the Conservatives have committed to reducing immigration by about half. It's not enough, but its a start.
Absolutely spot on and in a few simple words. Two world wars left Britain broken in so many ways and in rushed the evil Marxists. The book '1913: The World Before WW1' is incredible, so much was going well, until those idiot, militarist toy soldier Germans wrecked everything.
In 1914 barely 25% of British people owned their own home. Today it's 64% although the Right wing is doing everything possible to lower that so the oligarchy has as many people renting as possible.
I just watched a report in German public TV news on the memorial service for the victims of Aschaffenburg. It is excruciating to watch because of the quotes they chose to highlight from the catholic and protestant ministers and an imam who spoke, roughly summed up as: "let us not instrumentalize this and allow hatred to divide us."
It is like a broken record after every such tragic event. The focus is shifted away from the deranged criminals who should never have been allowed to enter the country in the first place to a message of "diversity is our strength, let us cling to this mantra no matter what", to marginalize people who are calling for meaningful change to policies.
This diversity cult won't even allow the brutal slaughter of children to cause a rethinking of priorities.
And just wait to see what they do when the next crash comes: the Hard Right are already strategising against the State pension.
If they can break the value of public and private pensions they can then use inflation to force the old to start burning through their savings and then be forced to sell their homes. The only people who will be able to afford to buy them will be the asset management firms
So all these bitter young people they're trying to wind up will inherit nothing from their families and still be left renting.
And of course the IEA crowd are talking about ending bank bailouts. Which of course the way they would run it means the depositors would be wiped out while the owners of the bank made off with what was left.
Great article. I can’t see it changing either, for exactly the reasons you describe. Another great point of Thomas Sowell’s applies too doesn’t it? The ‘anointed’ (and their toadying helpers) don’t pay any penalty for being wrong. If Blair, Cameron, Starmer and all the others were meaningfully penalised for being as wrong as they have been about ‘diversity’, immigration, appeasement of Islam and so on, would we be where we are now? I very much doubt it. Until that changes (assuming we don’t have systemic political change, find a British Trump, etc) we will continue down the dreadful path we are on I’m afraid.
I don't think they really believe it. At least not all of them. They say it because they are, fundamentally, afraid; afraid of the opprobrium of each other and, especially, afraid of the Islamists. They say it because they don't have the moral courage to articulate an alternative rooted in national identity, heritage and culture; because they don't wish to branded a far right intolerant fascist; and because they want to maintain the illusion of economic growth that continued mass immigration allows. Saying 'diversity is our strength' sounds nice, and it gets you the favour of the mainstream media. The problem is that it's keeping our culture in a hole, which is only getting deeper by the minute. At least, Trump's election offers hope that saying the unsayable can actually be a vote winner. As does the continued rise in popularity of Reform.
Here is a question: why aren’t Brits on the streets to finally make themselves heard or seen by the Westminster fools? I am not talking about small protests that end up in riots like the last ones, but I am talking millions of Brits demanding peacefully but firmly an end to immigration from Muslim-majority countries now. Every Saturday. How long would they be able to ignore 5 million Brits in London city center every weekend? If millions demanded Starmer step down now, how long before the Labour Gov would in fact wobble?
Why isn’t it happening? Because too many people in this country feel the same as ‘the elites’, are cocooned from the impact of immigration, are afraid of confronting the real bully in the room - Islamism - and prefer an alternate reality (diversity is our strength) over real life (Britain being subverted from within), and are too comfortably numb watching reality bullshit like ‘The Traitors’ whilst gobbling down beers and vinegar crisps. Let’s ignore the real traitors in our midst and let’s entertain us with the screens.
We haven’t quite reached the bottom of the shit barrel yet here, it hasn’t hurt quite enough people yet, otherwise we might actually remember that our freedom and way of life is precious beyond words and then we would be getting our bums of the sofa doing sth about it.
This is a good question. Yes most middle class are still cocooned, the thing is it will become more and more expensive to keep yourself cocooned or 'buy yourself' out of the mess. This is why people only have 1 child or 2 tops in the UK anymore. If they had anymore then couldn't live their cocooned life.
The most common boilerplate response I’ve seen recently is: “well statistically more white men commit sexual offences against children than Pakistani Muslims”.
To which my response is, thanks for pointing out that we already have enough child rapists. We don’t need anyone else’s.
Yes, this response is everywhere at the moment and has a few content creators/ commentators constantly wringing their hands about 'being fair'.
Fine. But where are the statistics? All I've personally seen was a report someone on here was waving around gleefully, which frankly did not stand up to scrutiny when examined, for a number of reasons.
Was this idea (about white rape gangs/white sexual abuse) part of the Jay report? What am I missing?
The liberal left don’t understand maths. Whites commit more rape because there are (for the time being) more whites in the country. This is not the same - as any numerate person knows - propensity to commit child rape let alone gang rape.
As always the establishment lie and their lapdogs on the globalist left don’t have the IQ necessary to understand that.
They don't even try and understand! I mentioned above that someone on here was waving around this report they had found, that suggested to them that white people were committing vast amounts of child abuse. They pointed out a specific page of this report, but failed to read the notes on the very same page, that explained that the overwhelming majority of cases involving white people were for 'image offences'. Also that the overrepresentation of white people in this relatively small sample size (about 7000 cases), was likely down to underreporting of abuse in minority populations. In the report's very own words!
I completely agree. 'They' (activist-lawyer-politicians, billionaire philanthropists, transhumanist medical-industrial tycoons and the like) certainly believe they are The Ones, tasked with bringing their vision of utopia to fruition.
Untethered to any religious conception of reality, they are, nonetheless unwilling to attend to the inherent contradiction of utopianism, namely that it suggests a transcending of material reality - literally a non-place. This leads to despotism and dystopia, with the enforcement of utopian ideals upon imperfect humanity leading to so much collateral damage in the pursuit of the unattainable.
Weaknesses-People , especially children are fragile and die when maniacs stab them. See threats below.
Opportunities-Cheap labour
Threats- The lure of free benefits attract undocumented people of different cultures to us, SOME of whom are required by their religion to kill the infidels that's Jews, Christians, Atheists and any NON muslims
Your piece is very interesting because it is clear account of the British middle class view.
My difficulty is that you say the changes to the population were not deliberately aimed at the destruction of England.
You say: 'The elite have a vision of Britain and it is one of open borders and ultra-diversity.'
The destruction of England is synonymous with the removal of borders and removal of the association of the English People with England. A more complete destruction is hard to imagine - only the systematic murder of the People would be more effective. A land without its People is no longer the same country.
Surely a vision of England that entails the destruction of England is the same as intentionally destroying England?
Diversity is their strength. Because "they" are the diverse. It is thought control through language manipulation. The majority cannot be diverse because by definition the diverse are in the minority.
The phrase plainly says "we have a strength that most of you don't because we are different". If it is delivered by a leader it is incredibly insulting to the subjects. That "we" accept it as valid demonstrates it as true.
I was born in Barking in the 70s. No community did more to resist the mass immigration project.
People living there in the 80s and 90s saw all this coming.
Today is a complete disaster zone.
Only the BNP saw the long-term trends.
We have to admit the centre Right and small c conservativeism across the West has completely failed to conserve ANYTHING from 1945.
They've conserved the power of the bankers
Canadian here. Listened to your new Conservative leader's conversation with Kostantin and the other guy on the Trigernomytry podcast. I gotta say, I was utterly underwhelmed by her positions on immigration and a whole host of other issues. To say she didn't get it was an understatement. Perhaps this is a good thing because it will put more people onto Reform or whatever right-ist party is going to give the UK back to the people. In Canada, the Conservatives have committed to reducing immigration by about half. It's not enough, but its a start.
Absolutely spot on and in a few simple words. Two world wars left Britain broken in so many ways and in rushed the evil Marxists. The book '1913: The World Before WW1' is incredible, so much was going well, until those idiot, militarist toy soldier Germans wrecked everything.
In 1914 barely 25% of British people owned their own home. Today it's 64% although the Right wing is doing everything possible to lower that so the oligarchy has as many people renting as possible.
I just watched a report in German public TV news on the memorial service for the victims of Aschaffenburg. It is excruciating to watch because of the quotes they chose to highlight from the catholic and protestant ministers and an imam who spoke, roughly summed up as: "let us not instrumentalize this and allow hatred to divide us."
It is like a broken record after every such tragic event. The focus is shifted away from the deranged criminals who should never have been allowed to enter the country in the first place to a message of "diversity is our strength, let us cling to this mantra no matter what", to marginalize people who are calling for meaningful change to policies.
This diversity cult won't even allow the brutal slaughter of children to cause a rethinking of priorities.
Never ever forget we have to have this propaganda relentlessly pushed because the oligarchy wants waves and waves of cheap labour.
Plus, no economic system will invest in training, robotics, technology, increase pay and conditions if it can just fly in labour.
Liberal Democracy is just rule by international finance and the Merchant class.
And just wait to see what they do when the next crash comes: the Hard Right are already strategising against the State pension.
If they can break the value of public and private pensions they can then use inflation to force the old to start burning through their savings and then be forced to sell their homes. The only people who will be able to afford to buy them will be the asset management firms
So all these bitter young people they're trying to wind up will inherit nothing from their families and still be left renting.
And of course the IEA crowd are talking about ending bank bailouts. Which of course the way they would run it means the depositors would be wiped out while the owners of the bank made off with what was left.
Great article. I can’t see it changing either, for exactly the reasons you describe. Another great point of Thomas Sowell’s applies too doesn’t it? The ‘anointed’ (and their toadying helpers) don’t pay any penalty for being wrong. If Blair, Cameron, Starmer and all the others were meaningfully penalised for being as wrong as they have been about ‘diversity’, immigration, appeasement of Islam and so on, would we be where we are now? I very much doubt it. Until that changes (assuming we don’t have systemic political change, find a British Trump, etc) we will continue down the dreadful path we are on I’m afraid.
I don't think they really believe it. At least not all of them. They say it because they are, fundamentally, afraid; afraid of the opprobrium of each other and, especially, afraid of the Islamists. They say it because they don't have the moral courage to articulate an alternative rooted in national identity, heritage and culture; because they don't wish to branded a far right intolerant fascist; and because they want to maintain the illusion of economic growth that continued mass immigration allows. Saying 'diversity is our strength' sounds nice, and it gets you the favour of the mainstream media. The problem is that it's keeping our culture in a hole, which is only getting deeper by the minute. At least, Trump's election offers hope that saying the unsayable can actually be a vote winner. As does the continued rise in popularity of Reform.
Beautifully written and from the heart. Thank you.
Spain lived under Islamic rule for centuries and still turned it around.
You were allowed to kill them then.
Not allowed today
c`mon, sugar coat it a little.
Technically Charlemagnes Empire was a sort of Caliphate so I guess you could say France, Germany and Italy turned it around too.
Here is a question: why aren’t Brits on the streets to finally make themselves heard or seen by the Westminster fools? I am not talking about small protests that end up in riots like the last ones, but I am talking millions of Brits demanding peacefully but firmly an end to immigration from Muslim-majority countries now. Every Saturday. How long would they be able to ignore 5 million Brits in London city center every weekend? If millions demanded Starmer step down now, how long before the Labour Gov would in fact wobble?
Why isn’t it happening? Because too many people in this country feel the same as ‘the elites’, are cocooned from the impact of immigration, are afraid of confronting the real bully in the room - Islamism - and prefer an alternate reality (diversity is our strength) over real life (Britain being subverted from within), and are too comfortably numb watching reality bullshit like ‘The Traitors’ whilst gobbling down beers and vinegar crisps. Let’s ignore the real traitors in our midst and let’s entertain us with the screens.
We haven’t quite reached the bottom of the shit barrel yet here, it hasn’t hurt quite enough people yet, otherwise we might actually remember that our freedom and way of life is precious beyond words and then we would be getting our bums of the sofa doing sth about it.
This is a good question. Yes most middle class are still cocooned, the thing is it will become more and more expensive to keep yourself cocooned or 'buy yourself' out of the mess. This is why people only have 1 child or 2 tops in the UK anymore. If they had anymore then couldn't live their cocooned life.
Way too much truth here laura
The most common boilerplate response I’ve seen recently is: “well statistically more white men commit sexual offences against children than Pakistani Muslims”.
To which my response is, thanks for pointing out that we already have enough child rapists. We don’t need anyone else’s.
Yes, this response is everywhere at the moment and has a few content creators/ commentators constantly wringing their hands about 'being fair'.
Fine. But where are the statistics? All I've personally seen was a report someone on here was waving around gleefully, which frankly did not stand up to scrutiny when examined, for a number of reasons.
Was this idea (about white rape gangs/white sexual abuse) part of the Jay report? What am I missing?
The liberal left don’t understand maths. Whites commit more rape because there are (for the time being) more whites in the country. This is not the same - as any numerate person knows - propensity to commit child rape let alone gang rape.
As always the establishment lie and their lapdogs on the globalist left don’t have the IQ necessary to understand that.
They don't even try and understand! I mentioned above that someone on here was waving around this report they had found, that suggested to them that white people were committing vast amounts of child abuse. They pointed out a specific page of this report, but failed to read the notes on the very same page, that explained that the overwhelming majority of cases involving white people were for 'image offences'. Also that the overrepresentation of white people in this relatively small sample size (about 7000 cases), was likely down to underreporting of abuse in minority populations. In the report's very own words!
If children get to die by a Hundred cuts the perpetrator does too. No matter they are under the age of Eighteen.
I completely agree. 'They' (activist-lawyer-politicians, billionaire philanthropists, transhumanist medical-industrial tycoons and the like) certainly believe they are The Ones, tasked with bringing their vision of utopia to fruition.
Untethered to any religious conception of reality, they are, nonetheless unwilling to attend to the inherent contradiction of utopianism, namely that it suggests a transcending of material reality - literally a non-place. This leads to despotism and dystopia, with the enforcement of utopian ideals upon imperfect humanity leading to so much collateral damage in the pursuit of the unattainable.
Dear Keir Starmer.
A SWOT analysis:-
Strengths-Diversity
Weaknesses-People , especially children are fragile and die when maniacs stab them. See threats below.
Opportunities-Cheap labour
Threats- The lure of free benefits attract undocumented people of different cultures to us, SOME of whom are required by their religion to kill the infidels that's Jews, Christians, Atheists and any NON muslims
Muslims.
That's marketing in the UK today-thoughts ?
Your piece is very interesting because it is clear account of the British middle class view.
My difficulty is that you say the changes to the population were not deliberately aimed at the destruction of England.
You say: 'The elite have a vision of Britain and it is one of open borders and ultra-diversity.'
The destruction of England is synonymous with the removal of borders and removal of the association of the English People with England. A more complete destruction is hard to imagine - only the systematic murder of the People would be more effective. A land without its People is no longer the same country.
Surely a vision of England that entails the destruction of England is the same as intentionally destroying England?
A clear exposition, thank you.
The Anointed are supported by the Internationalists.
The classic Internationalist is a middle class teacher whose favourite song is 'Imagine' by John Lennon. They are New Racists but do not know it. https://therenwhere.substack.com/p/the-new-racism
The replacement of the English was deliberate in the sense that mass migration is a revolutionary polarisation of society and it also suits the agenda of multinational business. https://therenwhere.substack.com/p/why-did-the-english-self-destruct
Diversity is their strength. Because "they" are the diverse. It is thought control through language manipulation. The majority cannot be diverse because by definition the diverse are in the minority.
The phrase plainly says "we have a strength that most of you don't because we are different". If it is delivered by a leader it is incredibly insulting to the subjects. That "we" accept it as valid demonstrates it as true.
Oh I might have to steal that first line. That’s very good.