Last week I gave my opinion on Gregg Wallace. This week at TCW I explained why the media coverage of his alleged wrongdoing was immoral and outrageously disproportionate to the conduct alleged.
I compared it to the coverage given to the widespread rape and abuse of white working-class girls in Rotherham and Oxford by gangs of Asian men. The contrast between the media treatment of the two cases highlights one universal truth in Britain: some victims count, and some victims don’t.
I said, “Some issues deserve the lectern treatment (Far Right Thuggery), and some issues don’t (rape of thousands of girls in towns mainly in the north of England). Some victims count (middle-class women of a certain age who work in the media), and some victims don’t (white working-class girls in Rotherham).”
I also noted, “The other reason Gregg Wallace dominated the front pages is because he is the perfect villain: a white working-class geezer done good. So the media will go after him. But if you are an Asian man who treats white working-class girls as trash, something to be raped, passed around to other Asian men, urinated on and kept in a cage, you are rarely exposed as the child rapist and child trafficker that you are. This would jeopardise the sacred mantra of Diversity is our Strength. So it gets buried for decades until it becomes so obvious that someone somewhere has to say stop.”
You can read the full piece here: TCW
Thanks for your recognition on this. I'm currently uploading my court case to my substack as a victim of, what I described to the court as being, "politically correct, genocidal rape." My notes will provide legal explanation. I was left to get raped and left to self-represent my rape case. I won, I set precedent and the MSM didn't want to know. The same with much of the alternative media too. I always appreciate others discussing these genocidal rapes.
A spot on TCW article. Thanks for clarity
Amr Australia